SE raised the following Comment:
- presenceOfRedTriangle attribute in VmsPictogram class is lacking [0..1] after "Boolean". Thus it is not possible to state that a red triangle is not available on the VMS. If not available, then it does not make sense to state "true" or "false"
and propose the following change:
Replace presenceOfRedTriangle: Boolean with presenceOfRedTriangle: Boolean [0..1]WG8 propose to introduce a 3 state attribute with values meaning the image represented by the Picto to be a Danger Sign (which should normally be represented with a Triangle) or not
- Danger Sign with Red Triangle
- Danger Sign without Red Triangle
- Not a Danger Sign
this breaks the assumption that CEN documents complies to version 2.0
have to be solved in version 3.0
Raised again at CEN systematic review - made optional in revision 809.