Revise the Location referencing systems included

Submitted by jaderberg on Thursday, 15 January, 2015 - 14:42
Issue ID
174
Component
UML Location Referencing
Category
Feature request
Priority
Normal
Assigned
Status
Fixed
Source
Website
Description

 In the new 3.0 version the OpenLR extension should be included in the level A model. At the same time we should asses if we should keep TPEG Loc or not? My understanding is that TPEG loc is more or less decrepted and would be replaced by URL in future.
 

{"changeLogs":[{"date":1528369036360,"componentOLD":"- Select a value -","component":"UML Location Referencing","categoryOLD":"- Select a value -","category":"Feature request","priorityOLD":"- None -","priority":"Normal","assignedOLD":"","assigned":"iancornwell (42)","statusOLD":"- None -","status":"Fixed"},{"date":1537268480536}]}

Posted by bard on July 23, 2028 Permalink

I have asked TISA to take a position on this. I am aware of developments there, but the actual status of the TPEG location referencing discussions are not clear yet.

Posted by iancornwell on September 23, 2027 Permalink

Resolved by Germany's work in October - approved extensions promoted to core.

Posted by AnthonyLuna on June 13, 2022 Permalink

You should always revise your location after some time. After you have revised it then you should click resources and check them. Being double sure never hurts. You can never be too careful. It is better to be safe than sorry.