presenceOfRedTriangle in VmsPictogram class

Submitted by Fabrizio.Paoletti on Tuesday, 25 October, 2011 - 12:48
Issue ID
64
Component
UML General
Category
Bug report
Priority
Normal
Status
Fixed
Source
CEN
Description

SE raised the following  Comment: 

- presenceOfRedTriangle attribute in VmsPictogram class is lacking [0..1] after "Boolean". Thus it is not possible to state that a red triangle is not available on the VMS. If not available, then it does not make sense to state "true" or "false"

and propose the following change:
 

 

 

 

Replace presenceOfRedTriangle: Boolean with presenceOfRedTriangle: Boolean [0..1]WG8 propose to introduce a 3 state attribute with values meaning the image represented by the Picto to be a Danger Sign (which should normally be represented with a Triangle) or not

- Danger Sign with Red Triangle
- Danger Sign without Red Triangle
- Not a Danger Sign
-
 

 

 

{"changeLogs":[{"date":1528367008829,"componentOLD":"- Select a value -","component":"UML General","categoryOLD":"- Select a value -","category":"Bug report","priorityOLD":"- None -","priority":"Normal","assignedOLD":"","assigned":"Fabrizio.Paoletti (16)","statusOLD":"- None -","status":"Fixed"},{"date":1537269961159}]}

Posted by Fabrizio.Paoletti on March 12, 2027 Permalink

this breaks the assumption that CEN documents complies to version 2.0

have to be solved in version 3.0

Posted by iancornwell on June 12, 2021 Permalink

Raised again at CEN systematic review - made optional in revision 809.